Saturday, February 14, 2009

What is the difference between Vedic and Kp

Hello Everyone,

I am extremely sorry for keeping all of you waiting for so long for this post. Satish ji, regarding your query on when will I post my next post, I would say, you do keep on checking it every day because I normally write whenever Baba wants me to and yes, Sorry for keeping you waiting :|

Krishnamurti Paddhati(KP) is the advanced version of Vedic astrology having more accuracy and less rules. Distribution of Cusps is done as per Placidus System in KP and Vedic follows Sripat Paddhati. Start of the Cusp is taken as Start point in KP and it is taken as Mid point in Vedic. Aspects are taken degree wise and they are applicable as per orb of individual planet in KP. Vedic astrology follows cusp to cusp Aspects. KP recommends a year of 365.25 days but vedic take it as 360 for easy calculations.The art of KP is having very less rules but vedic have lots of rules and books to get accurate prediction. KP is logical and vedic has lost the accuracy of predictions because of missed data. Ayanansha plays a major role in accuracy KP has its own and single ayanansha but vedic has lots of ayanansha. Each Ayanansha gives the different values to Planets and Cusps. One can learn KP in very few months but one can not learn vedic in his life. Vedic can not pin point the time of frutification but KP can tell the exact time of frutification of the event. KP treat 9th Cusp as the House of Father but Vedic take 10th Cusp for Father. KP has sub divided each planet and cusp Sign (Dasha) into Bhukti, Bhukti into Antar and Antar into Pratyantar in the same ratio as done by sage Parashar in Vimshottari Dasha. It gives the more accuracy but vedic does not follows so. Vedic follows Navamansha of Moon Sign only but KP follows navamsha of Nakshatra of each Planet and Cusp. KP introduced a new fast moving point which can differentiate between two early births as twins, it is known as Fortuna. KP says that Mercury never Combust(अस्त) from Sun.

Hope you find this article Nice... until next one GodSpeed :)

2 comments: